Calendar of Russian cultural events organised in Belgium and Europe

The workshop coordinators are Andrey Makarychev (Tartu University) and Fabienne Bossuyt (Ghent University).
Organized by Russia Platform of Ghent University, in cooperation with Tartu University
The workshop is postponed to November 2021. Exact dates will be announced by June 2021.
Rationale
This workshop addresses the question what kind of power applies to Russia. In doing so, it seeks to offer a platform for interdisciplinary discussions around different conceptualizations of power in the domestic and foreign relations of contemporary Russia.

Given the multiple research questions that the COVID-19 pandemic and crisis have opened up in relation to Russia’s power, the call for papers now also welcomes papers that deal with topics relating to the effects and implications of the current pandemic and crisis for Russia’s power, such as the new understanding of hybrid threats, Russian ‘health diplomacy’, disintegrative trends in the EU and the Eurasian Economic Union, COVID-19’s impact on the situation in eastern Ukraine, domestic decentralization within Russia and the new situation for Russophone communities in the Baltic states.

A growing number of conceptual outlooks in academic scholarship are competing to qualify and explicate the kind of power that applies to Russia. Scholars studying Russia’s foreign policy have for a long time been interested in understanding the intricacies of established notions such as soft power and hard power and their different dimensions, be it economic, cultural, normative or military. However, since the annexation of Crimea and the following war in Donbas, a new interest in understanding Russia’s power has developed, as these events revealed a strong perceptional gap between an increasingly illiberal Russia and a wider West. New concepts have emerged that are specifically designed to better qualify and understand Russia’s power. Mark Galeotti, for instance, has qualified the Kremlin’s dark power as a state’s capacity to intimidate in contrast to the soft power analogue of attraction through positive relationships. Christopher Walker, in turn, has proposed the idea of sharp power in reference to Russia’s (and China’s) interferences in Western democracies.

Interpretative attempts of established approaches to contemporary power in Russia, such as ideological and institutional perspectives, are also part of the academic discourse. However, they leave open many gaps, as they fail to fully grasp Russia’s post-/trans-ideological hybridity. Putin’s conservative project is usually referred to as an alleged crux of the regime, yet there is much more convincing evidence of Russia’s post-/trans-ideological hybridity, which neither sits well with nor respects either liberal–conservative or left–right divisions. Ultimately, Putin’s rule appears to have evolved into a trans-ideological amalgamation of diverse narratives belonging to different semiotic and language registers, those of religion, science, memory politics, and public morals. The trans-ideological pinnacle of Putin’s regime may be understood as a revolutionary conservatism in the sense that it revolts against the existing international order instrumentally resorting to conservative policy justifications.
. . . . . . . . . . . see link below. . . . . . . . . . .

Calendrier d'événements à caractère culturel russe en BelgiqueКалендарь мероприятий, связанных с русской культурой в Бельгии Agenda van gebeurtenissen met Russisch cultureel karakter in België

Calendrier d'événements à caractère culturel russe en Belgique
Календарь мероприятий, связанных с русской культурой в Бельгии
Agenda van gebeurtenissen met Russisch cultureel karakter in België